Unfiltered evidence of plagiarism, distortion, and abuse of Vajrayana teachings; conclusively affirmed through desperate deletions by the abuser of Buddhadharma and public trust itself.
♣
Owning several websites and publications, Adele Tomlin tries to position itself as a private individual, expecting the world to leave it alone while avoiding responsibility for the global platforms it operates. it regularly claims harassment and discrimination, framing itself as a lone "white, beautiful, and talented" teacher-scholar-practitioner-translator in Vajrayana Buddhism. Such claims are often leveled against critics who question its actions, dismissing them as "anti-feminist," "sexist" or "jealous," while deflecting from the real issues at hand: its public conduct and decisions. Framing legitimate critique as "defamation" or "personal attacks," especially when that critique is rooted in evidence from its public works, is deceptive at best and evasive at worst. Feminism is twistedly weaponized to shield against accountability. The fact that it loudly claims to be a qualified barrister (are you even capable of arguing with one?) is even more damning: Why is it unable to take full accountability for its actions, defend itself properly, address public concerns professionally, but instead "defames itself" (no haters needed) repeatedly with primitive countermoves of fear through silencing attempts and lust through defiling sacred spaces? Why would Adele Tomlin assume the higher minds propelling questioning can be effectively shut down (better yet, annihilated!) by activating the lower parts of the body? Adele Tomlin clearly demands attention so desperately to a perverted extreme, going so far as to abandon dignity and embrace indecency with its various low-effort maneuvers. This site will give it fully just that: public attention that comes with full accountability.
This site can potentially be framed as harassment, by Adele Tomlin. If this so-called "harassment," or however you want to call it, would protect the public against harms, should it be stopped? Or should we all become complicit by remaining silent and condone any form of ongoing abuse in Vajrayana? Let's talk about purpose. Harassment policy is enforced to protect individuals from harm and create safe environments, not to shield public figures from enacting public harms by framing exposure as discrimination. Condoning evasion of accountability constitutes a real risk to public safety.
Even if this site does not accomplish much in the goal of public protection, how has it harmed anyone — not even Adele Tomlin — but merely inconvenienced Adele Tomlin in enacting its plots within Vajrayana Buddhist circles? By 'inconvenienced,' we mean readers who access our materials get to pause, verify, and think for themselves — a deep blow to Adele's fully coherent work ethics perhaps. Its lofty aim as a scholar-translator has always been to pamper the public by laying bare the 'truth,' saving any efforts for independent scrutiny. Why would we waste energy to think for ourselves when Adele has kindly interpreted everything for us, backed by the neatly formatted lengthy footnotes in its 'translations' ready for direct ingestion? Anyone who raises a small question even will simply be blocked from accessing its Facebook page. The fidelity to its twisted work ethics is truly unmatched in any other professions. If Adele's works have indeed been benefiting the public and we have defamed or harassed Adele unfairly, wouldn't the public see through the baselessness of our assertions and dismiss our voice anyway? Why the need to block the public from accessing our content? Why the need to intervene with the public right in exercizing judgment? Most importantly, why would our critiques be rooted in Adele Tomlin's own public-facing works — verifiable by the public — and not baseless rumors or some made-up unverifiable accusations?
The enormous amount of time and labor invested in putting together this evidence-based archive for public access is justified only when it affects the integrity of Vajrayana. Not some petty disagreements with an individual out of personal vendetta. We do not know Adele Tomlin in person and have no interest in its private life. Our focus is never on Adele; it should quit seeing the world revolving around its ego. Our focus is on preserving direct access to authentic Vajrayana study and practice. When you truly benefit from the precious Vajrayana teachings passed down by lineage masters, you feel deeply indebted that there is nothing you can do to repay their kindness other than to preserve the Vajrayana teachings intact, ensuring the public derive similarly full benefit without distortion.
Our study of Adele Tomlin's public-facing works reveals undeniable patterns of systemic harms to Vajrayana through abusing the sacred name Dakini, stealing teachings from lineage masters, distorting the wisdom, and extorting donations to scale — truly the apex of the enlightenment business. Adele Tomlin can never be deterred, let alone harassed, as evidenced by its incessant acquisition of new website domains. It is the one who keeps harassing the public, or shall we say, ensnaring and abusing the public in every way (un)imaginable to mislead, distort, divide, and disrupt authentic Vajrayana study and practice for more than a decade since at least 2012, according to an insider.
This site exists to ensure that accountability is inescapable. We restore what is rightfully the public’s — critiques of Adele Tomlin’s misconduct and abuse in Vajrayana Buddhism based on its own public works and actions — to ensure transparency, scrutiny, and public review. They were previously removed from three different public blogs with no legal justification provided and are republished here to ensure public access. Selected articles are reconstructed from available backups since some were not archived, or the archived versions were outdated. Once publicly seen, our evidence speaks for itself. We don't bother to convince. Erasure inevitably becomes paramount to Adele Tomlin. Because our voice, our interest fully align with the public. The views presented on this site are drawn in good faith from publicly available records and republished content, and are intended for critical analysis. No legal claims are made. Content is preserved unless removal is required by a valid legal order or statutory obligation, in which case the removal and its basis will be documented. Verifiable responses, corrections, or rebutals supported by primary evidence will also be logged and indexed with the same visibility as the original records.
Throughout this site, the pronoun “it” refers to Adele Tomlin or associated platforms, emphasizing its impersonal public actions rather than gender or personal characteristics. Had Adele Tomlin not voluntarily entered public life through publishing, media engagement, and professional activity in Vajrayana Buddhism, this site would not exist to support independent scrutiny by restoring what would otherwise be inaccessible. We believe that the public deserves the right to access public-interest materials to draw their independent conclusions.