Unfiltered evidence of plagiarism, distortion, and abuse of Vajrayana teachings; conclusively affirmed through desperate deletions by the abuser of Buddhadharma and public trust itself.
♣
This content was previously removed elsewhere without notification and has been re-uploaded here for public scrutiny.
Original author: Shelia Adams
Original platform: medium.com
Original publication date: September 15, 2025
Source reference: https://medium.com/@sheliaadams/dna-settlements-and-misrepresentation-why-rumors-about-the-karmapa-dont-hold-up-eed8efb10bcf
The rumors collapse under their own weight. Both the alleged DNA test and the supposed multi-million settlement are not just unsupported — they are scientifically and legally implausible once we read the actual court documents.
A handful of blogs and social media posts — usually on anonymous or paid-domain platforms — claim that the 17th Karmapa, Ogyen Trinley Dorje, fathered a child confirmed by DNA and secretly settled with the mother. These claims are repeated as if they were fact.
But the official court record tells a completely different story. Misrepresentation like this doesn’t just mislead casual readers — it distorts perception of Buddhist teachers, undermines the Dharma itself, and abuses the authority of “truth” for clickbait.
When the case was first filed in May 2021, the court included a routine statement, accessible on https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/sc/21/09/2021BCSC0939cor1.htm:
“The allegations by the claimant are presumed to be true for the purposes of this application. Those allegations have not been tested in a court of law.”
This is standard legal boilerplate. No facts. Pure presumptions.
Then, it was formally discontinued without prejudice in September 2022. The record is also publicly available: https://trellis.law/doc/134062299/notice-discontinuance-post-rji
NOTICE OF DISCONTINUING ACTION - I, Vikki Hui Xin Han, hereby affirm that the above-entitled action, be and the same is, hereby discontinued as against Karma Triyana Dharmachakra Monastery, without prejudice and without costs to any party and this notice may be filed with the Clerk of the Court without further notice. Dated: September 14, 2022
Key points from the official record:
Key takeaway: claims of “DNA confirmation” or a “multi-million settlement” are unsubstantiated, contradicted by the filings, and legally implausible.
Even if someone insists on a “DNA confirmation,” the logic falls apart:
No chain of custody. No court seal. No incentive to withdraw. No plausibility.
"Without prejudice" means case withdrawn; no ruling, no settlement. Exactly what happened.
"With prejudice" means case permanently closed after judgment or settlement. Never happened.
Anyone claiming a DNA test or settlement ignores this legal black-and-white.
Twisting legal boilerplate into scandal misleads readers, damages trust, and cheapens genuine abuse cases. Rumor weaponizes ignorance of legal terms to smear reputations. When the Dharma itself is at stake, clarity is non-negotiable.
Claims about the Karmapa’s DNA or any settlement are unsupported by public evidence. Procedural filings, privacy protections, and the legal distinction between “with” and “without prejudice” unequivocally dismantle these rumors. Public clarity demands that we prioritize verified records over sensationalist narrative, even when such narratives are repeated by ostensibly authoritative sources.
The facts are simple. No DNA evidence. No settlement. No legal stain.
The allegations against the Karmapa were never tested, never proven, and ultimately abandoned.
No stain. No case. No excuse for gossip.